What Makes a Successful Place? « Project for Public Spaces - Placemaking for Communities


In evaluating thousands of public spaces around the world, PPS has found that successful ones have four key qualities: they are accessible; people are engaged in activities there; the space is comfortableand has a good image; and finally, it is a sociable place: one where people meet each other and take people when they come to visit. PPS developed The Place Diagram as a tool to help people in judging any place, good or bad:

Imagine that the center circle on the diagram is a specific place that you know: a street corner, a playground, a plaza outside a building. You can evaluate that place according to four criteria in the red ring. In the ring outside these main criteria are a number of intuitive or qualitative aspects by which to judge a place; the next outer ring shows the quantitative aspects that can be measured by statistics or research.

Access & Linkages

You can judge the accessibility of a place by its connections to its surroundings, both visual and physical. A successful public space is easy to get to and get through; it is visible both from a distance and up close. The edges of a space are important as well: For instance, a row of shops along a street is more interesting and generally safer to walk by than a blank wall or empty lot. Accessible spaces have a high parking turnover and, ideally, are convenient to public transit.

(Photo: Pioneer Courthouse Square, Portland, OR)

Questions to consider on Access & Linkages:

  • Can you see the space from a distance? Is its interior visible from the outside?
  • Is there a good connection between the space and the adjacent buildings, or is it surrounded by blank walls? Do occupants of adjacent buildings use the space?
  • Can people easily walk to the place? For example, do they have to dart between moving cars to get to the place?
  • Do sidewalks lead to and from the adjacent areas?
  • Does the space function for people with special needs?
  • Do the roads and paths through the space take people where they actually want to go?
  • Can people use a variety of transportation options – bus train, car, bicycle, etc. – to reach the place?
  • Are transit stops conveniently located next to destinations such as libraries, post offices, park entrances, etc.?
  • Comfort & Image

    Whether a space is comfortable and presents itself well – has a good image – is key to its success. Comfort includes perceptions about safety, cleanliness, and the availability of places to sit – the importance of giving people the choice to sit where they want is generally underestimated. Women in particular are good judges on comfort and image, because they tend to be more discriminating about the public spaces they use.

    (Photo: Luxembourg Gardens, Paris, France)

    Questions to consider on Comfort & Image:

  • Does the place make a good first impression?
  • Are there more women than men?
  • Are there enough places to sit? Are seats conveniently located? Do people have is a choice of places to sit, either in the sun or shade?
  • Are spaces are clean and free of litter? Who is responsible for maintenance? What do they do? When?
  • Does the area feel safe? Is there a security presence? If so, what do these people do? When are they on duty?
  • Are people taking pictures? Are there many photo opportunities available?
  • Do vehicles dominate pedestrian use of the space, or prevent them from easily getting to the space?
  • Uses & Activities

    Activities are the basic building blocks of a place. Having something to do gives people a reason to come to a place – and return. When there is nothing to do, a space will be empty and that generally means that something is wrong.

    (Photo: Kungstradgarden, Stockholm, Sweden)

    Principles to keep in mind in evaluating the uses and activities of a place:

  • The more activities that are going and that people have an opportunity to participate in, the better.
  • There is a good balance between men and women (women are more particular about the spaces that they use).
  • People of different ages are using the space (retired people and people with young children can use a space during the day when others are working).
  • The space is used throughout the day.
  • A space that is used by both singles and people in groups is better than one that is just used by people alone because it means that there are places for people to sit with friends, there is more socializing, and it is more fun.
  • The ultimate success of a space is how well it is managed.
  • Questions to consider on Uses & Activities:

  • Are people using the space or is it empty?
  • Is it used by people of different ages?
  • Are people in groups?
  • How many different types of activities are occurring – people walking, eating, playing baseball, chess, relaxing, reading?
  • Which parts of the space are used and which are not?
  • Are there choices of things to do?
  • Is there a management presence, or can you identify anyone is in charge of the space?
  • Sociability

    This is a difficult quality for a place to achieve, but once attained it becomes an unmistakable feature. When people see friends, meet and greet their neighbors, and feel comfortable interacting with strangers, they tend to feel a stronger sense of place or attachment to their community – and to the place that fosters these types of social activities.

    (Photo: Jackson Square, New Orleans, LA)

    Questions to consider on Sociability:

  • Is this a place where you would choose to meet your friends? Are others meeting friends here or running into them?
  • Are people in groups? Are they talking with one another?
  • Do people seem to know each other by face or by name?
  • Do people bring their friends and relatives to see the place or do they point to one of its features with pride?
  • Are people smiling? Do people make eye contact with each other?
  • Do people use the place regularly and by choice?
  • Does a mix of ages and ethnic groups that generally reflect the community at large?
  • Do people tend to pick up litter when they see it?
  • SWA Group’s Design for Nanjing Hexi New Town. Winning Entry

    SWA Group announced this week that its plan for a transformative 7-kilometer swath of Yangtze River waterfront of the Hexi New Town in Nanjing, China, was selected as the winning entry among the four finalist teams and will begin detailed design in July toward anticipated initial construction beginning in 2011. Nanjing is one of China’s most ancient metropolitan centers dating back 2500 years and was for centuries the capital of China, as shown in its name: Nan meaning ‘southern’, and Jing meaning ‘capital’.

    Components of the Riverfront redevelopment plan include:

    § a 75-hectare (185 acre) Yangtze EcoPark at the convergence of the Yangtze, Jiajiang and Qinhuaixin Rivers that will include a major mixed-use development with eco-hotel, shopping, housing and office

    space;

    § a 5 hectare (12.5 acre) site to include a Yangtze River Anthropology Museum;

    § a 64-hectare (160 acre) Hexi Plaza which will be the cultural epicenter of Hexi Riverfront Linear Park including a Hexi Performing Arts Center and multiple facilities for entertainment, retail, residential, office and waterfront experiential activities;

    § a 17-hectare (42.5 acre) Waterworks Park featuring family-entertainment, urban agriculture, tea follies, tourism and educational aspects;

    § a 25-hectare (62.5 acre) Art Park featuring an international art museum from a world-class architect to attract 3 million annual visitors, and would include associated museum lofts.

    “Nanjing Hexi has the opportunity to become one of the world’s great urban riverfronts by attracting people to it as an amenity of beauty, recreation, culture and commerce,” said Scott Slaney, principal of SWA. “The plan also addresses larger regional and national objectives including natural resource preservation, environmental regeneration and sustainability, economic vitality and social equity while maintaining flood protection and celebrating the beauty and history of the Yangtze River.”

    In replacing brownfield sites once dominated by industrial uses, Nanjing Hexi will employ environmental innovation and restoration including regenerating the water quality of the Yangtze River basin, he said.

    For example, wetlands introduced along the waterfront will help cleanse the river, which has high levels of suspended solids and chemicals. To kick-start the growth of wetlands and speed up the water-polishing process, thousands of strips of man-made bio-film will be “planted” along the water’s edge and in small, floating islands. These innovative bio-film strips replicate the process of water passing through living matter and cleansing out impurities, and will help stimulate further plant growth and animal habitat.

    As an international destination, Nanjing Hexi aims to gain prominence on the global stage by creating a world-class fine arts museum at the heart of the Art Park in the dramatic bend of the Jiajiang River. This International Museum of Fine Art, China’s first international fine arts museum, is planned to be designed by a globally-recognized architect for housing contemporary pieces from China and also art exhibits from around the world.

    Nanjing Hexi aims to accommodate Nanjing’s continued growth as the capital of Jiangsu Province and the largest commercial center in this region of China, and further attract global investors and international clients, said Slaney.

    Other notable features of Nanjing Hexi include a Yangtze River Museum of Anthropology which will employ exhibits and artifacts to teach the history of human settlement along the Yangtze; a small “eco hotel” that will have traditional rooms and rooms within the wetland park accessed by either a tranquil boat ride or serene stroll along a meandering boardwalk; expansive waterfront promenades and pedestrian access which will maintain a human, walkable scale to the planned retail/office/housing developments.

    An “Urban Garden” is made up of allotted plots for local residents to grow their own food. An adjacent tea garden, also called tea follies, provides a place to slow down and relax with family and friends. The garden will have the ability to harvest its own water, generate its own power, compost its own soil and become an important, productive landscape acting as a precedent for the City of Nanjing Hexi.

    Other SWA design team members included associates Yu Peiwen and Ricardo Supiciche as well as Ronghui Li, Yan Mei, Ying Hu, Chris Morton, Jessica Bacorn and Julianne Rader. Jones Lang LaSalle –Shanghai provided key market and economics research.

    Parklandschaft Tempelhof competition: Second round with six planning teams.


    Following closure in October 2008 of air traffic at Berlin's Tempelhof Airport, a 380-hectare area has become available for Berlin's urban development, whereby the 220-hectare airstrip is set to become a park for the citizens of Berlin.

    In March, the Berlin Senate Department for Urban Development launched the Parklandschaft Tempelhof landscape planning competition for the design of this open space. Of the 78 planning teams submitting entries, six have been invited to enter the negotiation procedure regarding the content, execution and costs of their proposals.

    The six shortlisted landscape architecture offices are:

    - BASE, Paris
    - bbzl böhm benfer zahiri, Berlin
    - Capatti Staubach, Berlin
    - gross.max, Edinburgh (see plan on the right)
    - Rehwaldt Landscape Architects, Dresden
    - Topotek 1, Berlin

    It is planned to exhibit the selected projects at the end of August in the Tempelhof airport building and provide people the opportunity for open discussion with the representatives of the planning teams during the event.
    The winning concept is to be chosen in mid-December.

    Between 1936 and 1941, Tempelhof Airport was enlarged by the Nazis into a major travel hub in line with their architectural ideas. Later on, during the Berlin Blockade of 1948/49, it became the focus of international politics as the landing place of planes flying in desperately-needed supplies when the Soviet Union blocked all access to Allied-controlled sectors of the city.

    11th Festival International des Jardins.

    11th Festival International des Jardins

    Until 23 October, Métis, Canada

    The 2010 Festival, which takes "Paradise" as its theme, displays a record 21 gardens at the festival site as well as extra-mural gardens in Montréal, Calgary and Toronto. The programme includes the airing of a new documentary film, "Twice Upon a Garden", as well as culinary, musical, cultural and artistic events throughout the summer. Since Berlin is the invited city, the line-up of conceptual gardens includes four new gardens created by Berlin designers invited to take part in the Festival.

    For more information, please visit:

    The Peter Joseph Lenné Prize 2010.


    Task A:

    Garden and Landscape Architecture

    Mailand, Italien - Corsico - Cesano

    Task B:

    Municipal Green Planning
    Berlin - Grünzug Hauptbahnhof - Flughafen Tegel

    Task C:

    Landscape Planning incl. Nature Conservation

    Metropolregion Rhein-Neckar


    Important dates:

    Competition documents (download) approx. 19 April 2010.
    The contributions must be received by the organizer not later than09 August 2010.

    Terms of Participation:

    Working teams or individuals will be considered as participants, provided none of the persons is older than 35 years of age on 09 August 2010.
    Each participant may participate in only one of the three tasks, and only with one piece of work.
    There are no further restrictive terms of participation.

    Request for complete competition documents:

    The documents can be downloaded soon.

    Procedure:

    The Peter Joseph Lenné Prize of the state of Berlin is a competition of ideas for garden and landscaping architecture and for the planning of open spaces and landscaping. The procedure especially aims at young landscape architects, planners, scientists, architects and artists who are in training or are employed in the above-mentioned special areas. The award is intended to support the professional development of young people and to promote new ideas and planning approaches in the design and planning of open spaces. The prize is awarded for three sections of garden and landscape architecture (A), municipal green space planning (B) and landscape planning including nature conservation (C) with one task for each. Two drafts in size DIN A 0 are required as paper printouts and one CD with the print versions of both plans as a PDF file. The focus is on the drawing presentation.

    The procedure will be handled as an anonymous competition until the jury has reached a decision on an award. The contributions will be submitted in the German language, English will also be accepted.

    An independent jury to be chosen by the organizer will select the best solution in each task field, which will then be awarded the Peter Joseph Lenné -Prize. Other especially good work may receive Peter Joseph Lenné merits. For work contributions of particularly high quality comprising plants, the Lenné prize procedures may award special Karl-Foerster recognition. The prize winners will be honoured in a ceremony on 15th November 2010 in the Academy of Arts, Akademie der Künste, in Berlin. A selection of work will be shown in an exhibition in Berlin. The results of the procedure as well as illustrations of the best and most interesting works will be published in the documentation of the bdla on the occasion of the 2011 prize of German Landscape Architecture (Deutscher Landschaftsarchitekturpreis).

    Jury 2010

    · Dr. Constanze A. Petrow
    Technische Universität Darmstadt, FB Architektur, FG Entwerfen und Freiraumplanung

    · Prof. Antje Stokman
    Universität Stuttgart, Institut für Landschaftsplanung und Ökologie Freie Landschaftsarchitektin, BDLA

    · Dr. Andreas Kipar
    Freier Landschaftsarchitekt, BDLA, Gruppe LAND, Deutschland, Italien

    · Dr. Claus Peinemann
    Verband Region Rhein-Neckar

    · Markus Kohlke
    Freischaffender Landschaftsarchitekt, Preisträger 2009

    Prize Money:

    A Peter Joseph Lenné Prize in the amount of 3,850 Euro can be awarded in each of the three sections A, B und C.
    Possible recognition merited by the Karl-Foerster Foundation amount to a total of 1,500 Euro.

    Further Information:

    Visit the website for the procedure.

    Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...